This calculator helps you compare the means of three or more groups. Unlike t-tests that can only compare two groups, One-Way ANOVA efficiently analyzes multiple groups while controlling for the risk of false discoveries that comes from multiple comparisons.
💡 Pro Tip: If you only have two groups to compare, use ourTwo-Sample T-Test Calculatorinstead for more appropriate analysis.
Ready to analyze your groups? to see how it works, or upload your own data to discover if your groups truly differ.
One-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) tests whether there are significant differences between the means of three or more independent groups. It extends the t-test to multiple groups while controlling the Type I error rate.
When comparing multiple groups, you might be tempted to perform multiple t-tests between all possible pairs of groups. However, this approach leads to a serious problem: an increased risk of Type I errors (false positives) .
For example:To compare means, ANOVA cleverly compares variances. If group means are truly different, then the variation between groups should be much larger than the variation within groups.
Between-group variance: How much do group means differ from the overall mean?
Within-group variance: How much do individual observations vary within each group?
Key insight: If group means are the same, F ≈ 1. If group means differ significantly, F ≫ 1. The p-value tells us how likely we'd see an F this large if there were actually no group differences.
Large mean difference (8 vs 11) + Small spread (SD=0.5) = Strong evidence of group differences
When group means are far apart and individual measurements have minimal variation, differences become clearly distinguishable.
Small mean difference (8 vs 9) + Small spread (SD=0.5) = Moderate evidence of group differences
When group means are relatively close but individual measurements show little variation, meaningful differences may still be detectable.
Large mean difference (8 vs 11) + Large spread (SD=2) = Weak evidence of group differences
When individual measurements vary widely within groups, even substantial differences between group means can be difficult to detect reliably.
Note: This is a visual demonstration only.
The "evidence strength" indications are simplified visual examples to illustrate ANOVA concepts. No actual statistical test is being performed here. In practice, an ANOVA test would calculate specific statistics (F-ratio, p-value) to formally evaluate the evidence for group differences.
Current scenario: Strong evidence of group differences
Key Components:
Between-groups sum of squares, where:
Within-groups sum of squares, where:
Final Test Statistic:
Where:
| Source of Variation | Sum of Squares (SS) | Degrees of Freedom (df) | Mean Square (MS) | F-statistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between Groups | ||||
| Within Groups | ||||
| Total | — | — |
Note:
| Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 7 | 8 | 10 |
| 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between Groups | 16.17 | 2 | 8.08 | 5.71 | 0.025 |
| Within Groups | 12.75 | 9 | 1.42 | ||
| Total | 28.92 | 11 | — | — | — |
Note: df between = k - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2; df within = N - k = 12 - 3 = 9
The critical value at is .
The calculated F-statistic () is greater than the critical value (), and the p-value () is less than our significance level (). We reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that not all group means are equal. Specifically, at least one group mean differs significantly from the others.
Eta-squared () measures the proportion of variance explained:
Guidelines:
For the example above, the effect size is:which indicates a large effect.
library(tidyverse)
group <- factor(c(rep("A", 4), rep("B", 4), rep("C", 4)))
values <- c(8, 9, 7, 10, 6, 5, 8, 7, 9, 10, 10, 8)
data <- tibble(group, values)
anova_result <- aov(values ~ group, data = data)
summary(anova_result)import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
group_A = [8, 9, 7, 10]
group_B = [6, 5, 8, 7]
group_C = [9, 10, 10, 8]
# Perform one-way ANOVA
f_stat, p_value = stats.f_oneway(group_A, group_B, group_C)
# Print results
print(f'F-statistic: {f_stat:.4f}')
print(f'p-value: {p_value:.4f}')Consider these alternatives when assumptions are violated:
This calculator helps you compare the means of three or more groups. Unlike t-tests that can only compare two groups, One-Way ANOVA efficiently analyzes multiple groups while controlling for the risk of false discoveries that comes from multiple comparisons.
💡 Pro Tip: If you only have two groups to compare, use ourTwo-Sample T-Test Calculatorinstead for more appropriate analysis.
Ready to analyze your groups? to see how it works, or upload your own data to discover if your groups truly differ.
One-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) tests whether there are significant differences between the means of three or more independent groups. It extends the t-test to multiple groups while controlling the Type I error rate.
When comparing multiple groups, you might be tempted to perform multiple t-tests between all possible pairs of groups. However, this approach leads to a serious problem: an increased risk of Type I errors (false positives) .
For example:To compare means, ANOVA cleverly compares variances. If group means are truly different, then the variation between groups should be much larger than the variation within groups.
Between-group variance: How much do group means differ from the overall mean?
Within-group variance: How much do individual observations vary within each group?
Key insight: If group means are the same, F ≈ 1. If group means differ significantly, F ≫ 1. The p-value tells us how likely we'd see an F this large if there were actually no group differences.
Large mean difference (8 vs 11) + Small spread (SD=0.5) = Strong evidence of group differences
When group means are far apart and individual measurements have minimal variation, differences become clearly distinguishable.
Small mean difference (8 vs 9) + Small spread (SD=0.5) = Moderate evidence of group differences
When group means are relatively close but individual measurements show little variation, meaningful differences may still be detectable.
Large mean difference (8 vs 11) + Large spread (SD=2) = Weak evidence of group differences
When individual measurements vary widely within groups, even substantial differences between group means can be difficult to detect reliably.
Note: This is a visual demonstration only.
The "evidence strength" indications are simplified visual examples to illustrate ANOVA concepts. No actual statistical test is being performed here. In practice, an ANOVA test would calculate specific statistics (F-ratio, p-value) to formally evaluate the evidence for group differences.
Current scenario: Strong evidence of group differences
Key Components:
Between-groups sum of squares, where:
Within-groups sum of squares, where:
Final Test Statistic:
Where:
| Source of Variation | Sum of Squares (SS) | Degrees of Freedom (df) | Mean Square (MS) | F-statistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between Groups | ||||
| Within Groups | ||||
| Total | — | — |
Note:
| Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 6 | 9 |
| 9 | 5 | 10 |
| 7 | 8 | 10 |
| 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between Groups | 16.17 | 2 | 8.08 | 5.71 | 0.025 |
| Within Groups | 12.75 | 9 | 1.42 | ||
| Total | 28.92 | 11 | — | — | — |
Note: df between = k - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2; df within = N - k = 12 - 3 = 9
The critical value at is .
The calculated F-statistic () is greater than the critical value (), and the p-value () is less than our significance level (). We reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. There is statistically significant evidence to conclude that not all group means are equal. Specifically, at least one group mean differs significantly from the others.
Eta-squared () measures the proportion of variance explained:
Guidelines:
For the example above, the effect size is:which indicates a large effect.
library(tidyverse)
group <- factor(c(rep("A", 4), rep("B", 4), rep("C", 4)))
values <- c(8, 9, 7, 10, 6, 5, 8, 7, 9, 10, 10, 8)
data <- tibble(group, values)
anova_result <- aov(values ~ group, data = data)
summary(anova_result)import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
group_A = [8, 9, 7, 10]
group_B = [6, 5, 8, 7]
group_C = [9, 10, 10, 8]
# Perform one-way ANOVA
f_stat, p_value = stats.f_oneway(group_A, group_B, group_C)
# Print results
print(f'F-statistic: {f_stat:.4f}')
print(f'p-value: {p_value:.4f}')Consider these alternatives when assumptions are violated: